Site Map || Contact Us
 
  RTI Act & Rules
   
  Section 4(1)(b) Disclosure
   
  PIOs
   
  FAAs
   
  Who is Who
   
  Cause List
   
  Complaint Status
   
  Orders/Decisions
   
  IEC Activities
   
  News & Events
   
  Photo Gallery
   
  Video Gallery
   
 
 
   Important Cases Decided by OIC  
  Complaint Case No. 127/2006  
  Complaint Case No. 614/2007  
  Complaint Case No. 768/2007  
  Complaint Case No. 125/2007  
  Second Appeal No. 70/2007  
  Complaint Case No. 194/2006  
     
 

Finding at Paragraph 7 of the Decision

 
 

Last but not the least there was ample debate regarding the deposit of application fees by sending Money Order. Rule 4 of the Orissa Right To Information Rules, 2005 is clear and express. Application fees can be deposited in cash. No where in the said Rule the Complainant has been asked to deposit the money in person. Therefore, there is no legal difficulty in receiving money order through the Postal Department which is cash. Such unfounded doubts should not be entertained by the PIO of the Public Authority.

 
     
  Important Interpretation  
 

It has been brought to the notice of the State Commission that many applications filed by the citizens under Section 6 of the RTI Act, 2005 are rejected by the PIOs because fee for the application has been paid in the shape of Indian Postal Order (I.P.O.) payable to the PIO of the concerned Public Authority. The PIOs take the plea that such mode of deposit of fee is not prescribed in Rule 4(1)(b) of the Orissa Right to Information Rules, 2005.

 
     
 

In the event of such deposit of Indian Postal Order the PIO can as well encash the fee amount from the Postal Department so as to deposit the same in the State Treasury under appropriate receipt Head. Admittedly such mode of payment has not been prescribed in the Rule supra. The State Commission has decided to permit such mode of payment of fee.

 
  By order of Hon'ble SCIC, Orissa  
  <<back